taraneon international blog Rotating Header Image

How agile is agile?

Agility seems to be on everyone’s mind and it follows that agility has become the main promise of process management, or rather of vendors of process management systems (BPMS). The positive aspect is that the industry has finally found an argument for an IT approach that can be put to either IT or non-IT people. Agility has a much greater and broader appeal than ‘automation’ or ‘BPEL-ability’, the latter being the most senseless sales argument the industry – long searching for THE clincher – has come up with in recent years. (Why should I invest in your product? Because we can do BPEL. And how’s that going to improve my processes? Eh, what??)

So, agility it is. Who wouldn’t want to be agile? Who would want to state that their company does not need to be agile? Being an agile company is a good thing and using agile processes to create value sounds like the right thing to do.

And can I state for the record that I love the concept of agility. There are too many examples of businesses with untapped potential, businesses which could do much better if only those barriers to change like time and effort to change processes and/or change IT didn’t exist or were significantly lower. In that sense, the promise of agility through better integrated BPMS which allow you to design a process (or a change to a process) and get it to run at the push of a button is a promise worth taking note of. Anyone involved with workflow management system implementations in the 90s or BPMS implementations in the following years will remember the projects that took longer to complete (and delivered less than promised) than … say the building of a new multi-story office tower. Four months of project work to design and implement an employee self-service process to speed up handling of applications for leave? This could be a thing of the past, at least from a technical perspective. BPMS have certainly improved in that respect and even if they don’t deliver push button implementation, they have come a long way from where they used to be.

Thankfully, this goes for the industry as a whole. Their promise of agility is something they can deliver on, regardless of whether you take vendor x, y or z. (Which by itself is remarkable for an industry that has lived on making promises and prayed to be able to fullfil them 5 years later)

Unfortunately, this does not benefit most businesses in any way – and this is unlikely to change any time soon. The very simple reason for my negative view is that businesses are basically unprepared for agility. They may want it, they may even need it but they can’t handle it. We have mentioned this before on our blog and I spoke at length on the topic of business readiness some weeks ago at an international conference. The shoe is now on the other foot. Instead of IT failure we are now seeing employees who are starved of process awareness, process managers who are unable to manage processes (though they administer them beautifully and use dashboards to watch them just like train spotters standing on the platform and ticking the arrivals off in their notebooks) and senior management which fails to provide process strategies and prefers to remain blissfully ignorant of all process things.

Preparing the enterprise for what comes out of process projects and for using the potential of what BPMS could deliver is the dominant challenge to business process success. Agility begins in the mind, though it very quickly moves on to aspects like governance, strategy, centres of excellence and many other very concrete issues which need to be addressed in order to turn a successful project into a successful process operation.

My guess is that this may also turn out to be the greatest challenge to new concepts like Outside-In. O/I, which is based on the approach of customer-driven rather than capability-driven processes, makes enormous demands on business agility. Think ‘push button process change’ and then extend the image to have the customer pushing the button. From a customers perspective this would be paradise and anyone who can provide that paradise can be sure of my life-long friendship. But even moving in that direction takes more than an agile IT. In requires an understanding of the customers, of their individualism, the dynamics of changes to their processes and the consequences and implications to the business in order to accommondate the customers requirements. Outside-In, probably more than any other process strategy, needs agility AND process management to make it work.

So, while agility sounds good, it needs a [mentally] agile business to make it work. Only then will agile-in lead to agile-out. Otherwise it’ll be the usual ten seconds of project fame stuff that basically means ‘seen to be doing something’. We should all have realized by now that while it may be easy and quick to buy the software, it won’t compensate for lack of knowledge and experience – something that takes far longer to build.

This posting wouldn’t be complete without mentioning that taraneon provides guidance and support on developing business readiness capability….but I think you’ve guessed that already.

One Comment

  1. [...] BPM Agility – Thomas J. Olbrich Unfortunately, this does not benefit most businesses in any way – and this [...]

Leave a Reply

Follow-up from our resident engineer

Norbert has kindly provided the calculations and formulas he used in the previous posting to let you check your results for yourselves.

Leave a Reply

Who wants to be a millionaire, the World Cup, a bit of physics and process time

(Freely translated from the original german posting by Dr. Norbert Kaiser, co-founder of taraneon and – unfortunately – an engineer)

Engineer

Now we come to the $100.000 question:

The speed at which a football travels through the air in Johannesburg is – as compared to Berlin – and presuming an otherwise identical force of kicking it:
a) lower
b) identical
c) greater
d) I don’t know what a football is

Ok, so you might just have the feeling that answer d) is probably not what we’re looking for. And you’d be right to think that this question will never be asked on ‘Who wants to be…’ or a business process quiz show (now there’s an idea). But there is a connection, but more on that later. First let us find the right answer to the question.

By the way, the usual BPM approach would be to kick a ball in Berlin, buy a first class ticket to Johannesburg, kick another ball and then decide you couldn’t have cared less and start looking for someone to blame.

But here’s how we get to the real answer:

Johannesburg lies 1.800m above sea-level while Berlin rests at a lowly 100m. Using the standard barometric formula we can calculate that the atmospheric pressure is 19% lower in Johannesburg. Assuming identical outside temperatures the rules of the ideal gas law apply which means that air density is also 19% lower. This results in a horizontal speed of the football which increases by the cube root of the inverse density.

No doubt you will have done the calculations in your head by now and correctly come up with a 7% increase in speed in Johannesburg. Answer c) is the right answer, which not only goes to explain some of the appalling goalkeeping we’ve seen but might be just as surprising as some of the results we’ve seen in the Process TestLab recently.

The following chart makes for a nice example:

worktime

What the graph shows is the work time required by 100 instances of the same process. Now, this was a process of which the process owner had told us that it got the job done and worked just fine. When we put the process through the Process TestLab and came up with the result that work time more or less continuously varied by factor 5 to 7 and that the reason for that lay in some unfortunate combination of business rules which led to process instances being handed back repeatedly to the originating department for no reason.

Looking at his departments method to validate processes, it was easy to determine why they didn’t (and couldn’t have) spotted this earlier: Even a detailed validation run using just a single process instance cannot provide you with a realistic view of a days business – in particular not if the validation is based on a model rather than a process. Anyway, a few simple changes to the process have now helped him not only in improving on those 100 process instances, but in making the process more efficient 365 days a year – rather like getting the $100.000 football question right not only once but every day. Which is why we think the Process TestLab provides great long term value.

(Final note to our friends everywhere except the UK: It’s only a proper World Cup if Germany beat England on penalties, otherwise it’s just some guys kicking a fast ball around, though Arsenal are the best team in the world)

(Chart: taraneon, pictures (licenced for re-use): flickr, army.mil)

One Comment

  1. Robert Lohne says:

    I’ll make the mandatory Monty Python reference.. what is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow.. (what do you mean, an african or european..) :D

Leave a Reply